My only disagreement is that I can't really grant title shots to those who improve the most simply because of how unstable the championship pictures are (and have always been in fedding). My only certainties are within feuds and angles, because as soon as a championship is added to the mix, I as a booker need to consider everybody else within that skill bracket as well. Example this month was Magnus Gunner, who had an incredibly close match with Dominik several weeks ago, and I immediately granted him a rematch in a PPV environment. However, the shaky thing with this is upon booking Code Blue did I realize some of Dominik and Magnus' inactivity with life itself, and therefore adding Santo to the mix to ensure the title was fought for and it's image withheld. But to Santo, is participation made sense because of the previous week's no contest tag match, which Mascaras made punctual for.
I see what you are getting at with the 'unstable title frame', but think about the opposite. Me, for example. Taking Code Blue in to account, I have been in the GHW New Age/World title match for all but 2 PPV's. Hell, I'm not complaining, but I am pretty sure it got stale to people (hence to BAAAAWWWW HUGHES IS ON THE BANNER AGAIN issues we had). With the winner of EVO being granted a title shot, it takes us away from the status quo. Sure, the match MIGHT not be as high in calibre, but it gets someone up there. Someone fresh. I say if we did this, we give the title shot idea a try. If it doesn't work, cancel that aspect. We are only doing this 2-3 times a year, right? It's collateral damageif anything.
I agree with Linette. But if we do anything like the "pro" thing, I would like to stake claim to either Vlad or Desperado. I'm sorry Ryan Hughes, but you have Wade as your PB, and that is just unacceptable in my book lol.
Hey, Delta picked me already. Take your Barrett-bashing elsewhere.
RYAN HUGHES 2x GHW New Age Champ 1x GHW World Champ 2010 NeXuS Deathmatch Winner