|
Post by Tommy Musashi on Dec 27, 2007 21:43:40 GMT -5
I'm always trying to improve anything I do, inovating, creating.. My mind is always thinking of new fresh ideas. Of course this isn't too new of an idea, but new to Hyper's Dynamic Ten. Did you like it the last way I did it? Or did you like the new one? Or maybey you have a better idea that you thought up. I'll be happy to hear anything you have to say.
|
|
|
Post by Rhaps on Dec 28, 2007 14:32:07 GMT -5
I think the previous format before the 4th edition was the best way of doing it so far but I did like the fact you added the previous standings on the 4th edition. The 4th edition could be improved by it from last to first.
|
|
|
Post by Desperado on Dec 28, 2007 16:37:44 GMT -5
I personally liked this way (4th Edition) better as it was very clear with who was where and why.
|
|
|
Post by mvp on Jan 4, 2008 15:25:58 GMT -5
I personally liked this way (4th Edition) better as it was very clear with who was where and why.
|
|
|
Post by Tommy Musashi on Jan 4, 2008 16:45:39 GMT -5
Can you all tell me what you guys liked about the new one and didn't like about the older one, and vice versa. It'll help me make a lot better top ten for you all.
|
|
|
Post by Desperado on Jan 5, 2008 17:22:03 GMT -5
I liked the fact that there was a up and down sign beside the names indicating if we have moved higher or lower. The names stood out against the numbers so it was clear who came at what place and I like the previous rank telling me the improvements everyone made.
|
|